First of all, I have every sympathy with Tappers Dad for wanting to understand the technicalities of what may have happened to 230 and, similarly, his interest in problems relating to other Nimrods. That said, I think I understand the point that Vim_Fuego is making.
Let us remember that this Thread was started by a certain Ian Liddell-Grainger, MP. He may or may not be solely concerned with the interests of one of his Constituents; who really knows what the true motives of a politician are. I would say that the man deserves the benefit of the doubt and should be afforded every courtesy. We must think of the possible outcomes, though. One may be a recognition that the Nimrod force is under-resourced and needs additional support and funding. On the other hand, it may recognise an under-resourced Nimrod force that is not deemed worthy of additional support and funding. The former case would to many here be a blessing and result in restoration of the Nimrods as safe available force elements. The latter case, though, would probably result in the loss of a still essential capability, at a net cash saving, as a duty of care matter.
Basically, while facts are facts, politics will always be politics and I would recommend caution and clarity on phrasing replies and points.