I think I judged my last post to be just about the right distance the other side of the truth to balance the rest of the pro RAF spin being put on the Falkland conflict at the moment.
Sorry, Tourist, but I think you judged wrongly.
The only 'pro-RAF spin' came in the Torygraph article which endeavoured to claim that the Vulcan won the war - even the RAF website doesn't say that...
Also, bear in mind that the reason that the RAF case may be being pushed a little more strongly than you like may not be unconnected with very clear and concerted attempts made by some members (or ex-members) of the RN and Army to write the RAF's contribution to the Falklands out of history.