JFZ90
“I'm surprised by this. Have you REALLY been instructed to ACTUALLY ignore real safety problems?”
Yes.
“and weak/unsubstantiated safety concerns challenged”
An example? I wouldn’t call “smoke in cockpit”, “crash landings” and “aircrew injured”, in the same sentence, in the same serious incident signal, weak. The supplier, who controlled funding (!) and refused to release funds to investigate and fix, obviously disagreed. Many more, but that’s the one I always remember. Ignored him, transferred money, fixed in 48 hours. Got bollocked. Aircrew safe. Next?