As we have narrowly avoided a "George Bush ate my Baby" thread, thanks to Brick, (always room on JB for that though) I do have to ask; what on earth was the point of that article in the Telegraph?
Just to stir the crap; to make the USA look like baby killers compared to our own steely-eyed ROE indoctrinated Aircrew; drive another wedge between international Military co-operation; provide a bit of comfort to the enemy, act in a seditious manner and undermine good conduct and military discpline, be a fifth columnist in general, or just to be another self-opinionated Journo who hasn't got the balls or intelligence to go out and find or accurately report some real news - I'm just curious you understand.