Reading the pages of that article absolutely amazes me. Is this for real?
Exactly my point. How do any of you know this is an accurate piece of reporting? Again, I point out how outraged many of you have been about poor, even misleading, reporting regarding military aviation in past threads.
Yet here it's taken as gospel.
From the Prince Harry deploying thread, posted by S. Sid:
As far the press are concerned, if past incidents are anything to go by, Sky will make up where he is,
Pot to kettle, over.................
Nail filled rockets and white phos!!!
Hmm, perhaps proof to the lack of accuracy in the report? A lot more sexy and gory than writing 2.75 in. FFAR.