The problem is The The is that you are being asked to think and try to experience a vicarious reality. What is valued by full time staff can be at the expense of casual staff. What has been implemented in part by FAAA assitance for full time short haul staff has been the profit of whom? Well, Qantas has profited and, more casuals have been employed so does this mean that more people have jobs? Its in part the quality of that existance and at the cost to who is the question and, who benifits and profits from what has been put in place?