BJCC..nice fellow you appear to be..play the man I guess
I am sorry, but you and reality have parted company
Then you assume an offense when...
The offence in question has nothing to do with being sober or otherwise, it has to do with an arbitary amount of alcohol in blood, nothing else.
NO offense was comitted
Really? this will be interesting, perhaps you'll poin to this case law for us then?
Oh brother..lead a horse to water and all that...........
but then don't contradict yourself...as evidence to arrest is part of ANY prosecution
A screening test is the way in which evidence to arrest is gathered.
Now a very convenient misinterpretation on your part..
There already is a 'qualified screener' it's a hand held elctronic device, usually called an ESD. It's what we have been on about, I don't think I've ever used a biased one, I mean it's a machine, it doesn't have a bias!!!
The "screener" in question is the human element..and the justification to employe the machine..not the machine itself....which brings me back to my question...
Where is the justification?