PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Instrument Approaches with failures
View Single Post
Old 1st Apr 2007, 05:55
  #38 (permalink)  
212man
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,354
Received 372 Likes on 210 Posts
IHL, that's my point entirely: surely you should announce what range you are when you get to beacon/dme crossing height, not what height you are when you get to the range? One of the primary purposes of the check is to confirm serviceability of the glideslope (and to a lesser extent, the correct lobe) and the safest way to do this is as I describe.

The NZ and Guam incident/accident would tend to support this.
212man is offline