Southbound
Thereagain, perhaps what Maintainer meant was that when travelling on duty, he stops at Service PAYD units for his meals and reclaims the actual costs, within capped DS limits. One interpretation of the JSP would be that, since he was not provided with Service accomodation (because he did not need it), and no "Service food" was "provided" (because he had to pay for it himself), the claim would appear to qualify. I can't see anything specific that would disqualify it either, but I haven't put the question to an expert.
So, don't be quite so quick to throw t6he word "fraud" around. It has nasty, and sometimes incorrect, connotations.
Regards
Ginseng