Lomapaseo
refer to my previous post. Why does somebody have to be 'the worst offender' before they actually have to do something?
Sorry for the analogy - are today's terrorists 'better' than a certain notorious German who died in '45? They have all killed.
Are airlines better than power generators? They are all polluting.
Best Regards,
N1 Vibes
I believe that we have not yet agreed on the usage of the word
offender in your context.
There is nothing offensive in living our lives in the world that we live in. Nature is a series of balances and we are only a tiny bit of it. To me it is the relativity to other humans that is important. So I'm willing to listen to arguments where my/our actions are upsetting the balances of nature in a measurable way. If you can't measure it, then how do I know that I'm measuably improving the world I live in?