Agree with Keg.
Mags has a bit over 100,000 shares according to Bloomberg; in my simple thinking that smells and quacks like an 'interest'...
And just taking Keg's argument one step further, if the market hasn't to date realised the inherent value in an enterprise, then should the directors not have already been acting to unlock it? If not, isn't there a level of culpability? In such a case, what have the directors been doing (or not doing) such that the full enterprise value has not been realised?