I beleive the 212/412 sim at SAS Flight Academy is based on a specific individual for each config (212 and 412) and should thus behave "exactly" like those individuals. It is reasonable to assume that the manufacturer does not have accurate data for catastrophic failures, but the rest is supposively registered during tons of flight hours with a lot of measurement gear on the real ship.
Being an IT guy, I feed on technical details...
Bell/AB 412 SP/HP, 212
Full Flight Simulator FFS Specifications
Basic engine and options PT6T-3B (B412SP), PT6T-3BE (B412HP), PT6-3B (B212)
Manufacturer CAE Electronics
Computer IBM 6000 model 591
Motion axis, type 6 DOF Hydrostatic, separate 3 DOF vibration platform
Visual MAXVUE™ Enhanced B
Display configuration 5 channels, 210º/40º field of view, 2 chin window displays
Approval Equivalent to FAA level D (Visual: Equivalent to FAA level C)
Date in service March 1998
AP, F/D Sperry
Miscellaneous equipment/features WXR, FLIR, Hover Indicator, GPS, Chaff/Flare, NVG-compatible flight deck and
visual system, ITEMS, debriefing video equipment