PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Flybe Recruiting and Ts & Cs
View Single Post
Old 28th Feb 2007, 09:27
  #309 (permalink)  
cavortingcheetah
Está servira para distraerle.
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: In a perambulator.
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

The point of this thread has not really been to lambaste Flybe. It has rather been to discuss the discrepancies, to use the word politely, between that which Flybe have advertised as a reward package in Flight International and that which is in reality upon the table. The two would not seem to bear much resemblance to each other, unless of course, one is extremely adept at imaginative interpolation.
The roadshow was a bit of a farce by all accounts. Not much of a constructive nature would seem to have emerged from two held yesterday other than the fact that one should continue to apply on line, which slogan seems to be a little bit of a company mantra. It would appear fair to say that neither were personal details taken nor were incentives held forth in the drive to recruit new pilots of any rank?
That is all very well except that, if a company needs recruits, it behoves that prospective employer to do a little more than distribute a few glossy pamphlets and a CD of questionable quality.
Now this may all be very arrogant but be that as it may; there are plenty of experienced pilots about who can actually pick and choose, to a certain extent, what they do with their lives and those of their families. The presentations of yesterday were surely, at least by all accounts, hardly impressive enough to attract many such long term candidates?
If some among the contributors to these threads may work for Flybe so much the better for them. Feedback to any employer should be an important tool in structuring future recruitment campaigns that may become necessary.
However, to rather rudely tell contributors to these pages to vanish in a puff of smoke and then, as it were, in the same breath of venom to threaten to forward these Pprune pages to the prospective employer concerned does nothing but draw ridiculous attention to the questionable attitudes of both parties concerned?

Last edited by cavortingcheetah; 28th Feb 2007 at 09:44.
cavortingcheetah is offline