Jet_A_Knight said:
Flown with primary reference to instruments, i believe it is reasonable to log as actual I.F.
Logging I.F time any time you fly under the IFR is bogus, or at cruise with the AP on.
This is contradictory! Suppose you fly 'in cruise with the AP on', and, at the same time, 'with primary reference to instruments'? What is it...VMC time, IMC time, IFR time? The whole question is stupid...do you actually...not refer to the instruments in cruise, and, if a deviation is noted, not take action to correct back to correct indications, based on instruments? If you do, you've flown primarily based on instrument indications...and the derivative question as to what kind of time to log, is...even more stupid!