PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - bring back ansett
View Single Post
Old 19th Feb 2007, 11:03
  #20 (permalink)  
Eastwest Loco
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Devonport Tasmania Australia
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably TAC, but the theory is the same. Not important apart from a marketing vehicle.
The majority of LCC passengers cannot get their heads around the fact that Jetset and Jetstar are different entities.

This includes intelligent business owning mates of mine.
You could comfortably use Bob Newhart's "Grace L Ferguson Airlines and Storm Door Company" as a name and operate a DC1 and get traffic if your marketing was up to scratch.

Qantas probably still have the Air Australia name locked up as TAA/Australian had that locked away.

East-West is no longer relevant as it referred to the original plans of our great little airline that actually never occurred at start up. There is an Indian carrier of that name now anyway.

It aint the name, it's the way you play the game.

Full service IATA carrier needed. We are over the cardboard cutouts.

Apply within.

Best all

EWL

Last edited by Eastwest Loco; 19th Feb 2007 at 11:45.
Eastwest Loco is offline