If it’s not Twiggs it’s BA and I don’t know which is morer wronger…ehh BA
A couple of points BA a classic has not got the same range as a 400.
The distance from SYD to NRT is less than SYD to LAX and therefore IF you think about it a 400 could not do a LAX return in the same time as it does a NRT return…What were you saying about THINKING BA?
The possibility about taking aircraft off the LAX run was never mentioned by me …only you BA.I think you should stick to paper shuffling in the office.
My point before Twiggs went south with it was that the Japanese market is supposedly important and we keep shafting it.Perhaps if the company was not playing games with our latest aircraft and giving them to other carriers we could use them in a far more efficient manner and not be forced to play catch up.
Even you BA might have read the articles on the weekend about QF putting pax on J* services when they have paid for a QF seat.They continually show a level of disdain for the customer that beggars belief.
The 300 is a relic and that is my point and as we need more aircraft we shouldn’t be giving them away to other carriers.This puts us in a position where we are forced to use aircraft that should be in Longreach.