Originally Posted by Joetom
9% is better that now't, but look at it another way, flying staff take out more than ground staff now, shut NAPs 1 and 2, then allow all staff to join this New NAPs on the same terms, only problem is this would be Fair.
.
The company said they wanted a one time fix on this pension, the above would fill that hole
Oh for pitys sake you moron! How many times do we need to ram it into your obviously thick skull that your claim that flying staff take out more is completey, utterly false. It is untrue. It is a lie which you perpetuate.
We could shut NAPS 1 and NAPS 2 if you like, but you'd still have to fund the deficit now and the whole deal would have to be restructured. You'd still have to pay your share, and the flying staff would still refuse to work extra years to fund your share of the deficit.
Spin it how you will, the deal is done and we're not going to pay for you. Welcome to the real world.
Originally Posted by yachtno1
I'd just like the flight crew to admit they've achieved a better deal than the ground staff!
I'd like the ground staff to admit that the flight crew are penalised by a greater increase in retirement age than they are, at that comes at a price.