PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - CAP 413 and AIP Confusion.
View Single Post
Old 10th February 2007 | 13:05
  #12 (permalink)  
Talkdownman
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 1
From: On the wireless...
"Do you think it's OK to omit the frequency and radio check call if you know that an A/G operator has only one radio?"
Is anybody gonna notice? I wouldn't lose sleep over it.......
"Also, with the different MATZ penetration calls. Are you saying use the military version of speaking to a military controller, e.g. MATZ penetration at Benson; and use the CAP 413 version if talking to a civilian controller, e.g. talking to Farnborough for a Matz penetration through Odiham?"
Is anybody gonna spot the difference? The air trafficker just fills the 'form' in. If he/she has any gaps and needs to know anything that you have omitted he/she will ask.
CAP413 was written by human beings. I think.
Therefore it ain't ever gonna be perfect.....
I've had some of my best flights by not talking to anybody. I wonder what trail of carnage I have left in my wake. No-one has ever complained. Well, not to me, anyway......
Talkdownman is offline  
Reply