With 24 years experience of flying fixed-wing and a CPL(A) qualification but only 100hours rotary and a CPL(H) qualification (and never harmed a machine or person)....
...surely I am a far better risk for insurance purposes than a 100hour rotary only pilot.
Does anyone agree/disagree? I get the feeling from other in the rotary world that fixed wings hours are completely worthless. But why? We fly in the same weather at least!
More importantly - do any insurers capable of providing coverage in Australia agree?
Opinions gladly recieved - I am about to ask for quotes for insurance on my first machine - a B47G5A.
OOW