Pegasus,
When it seems like there might be some light at the end of the tunnel(amalgamation of FAAA), I hear the strong adversarial overtones coming through in Mr Mijs letter.
While it is obvious that no industrial agreement should be blocked or thwarted does it have to be stated in such aggressive language.
Whilst we are aware of the need to state industrial niceties and protocols It would have been nice to see the words included that this agreement / merger gives the FAAA the opportunity to come to an agreed concensus prior and during industrial negotiations. Perhaps he might have run with the suggestion the new look FAAA is a united body in that when EBAs are negotiated officials representing both LHaul and Shaul are present and there are no discussions held with the company without all of the EBA negotiating body present.
To be honest it sounded a bit like our politicians and the water debate. They want to be seen to be supportive but no one is prepared to take the leap required and make the commitment.
I hope Im wrong Pegasus and could someone give mr Mijatov a new speach writer his letters smacks of aggressive undertones and arrogance. Imprimatuer really
