Would you like to be a passenger or a crew member in the aircraft which is not fitted with TCAS and is involved in a midair collision that could possibly have been prevented by the TCAS?
... of course not! .. equally the question could be asked :-
.
Would you like to be a passenger or a crew member in the aircraft which is fitted with TCAS and is involved in a midair collision that is the result of a GA ALT encoder that is 300ft out or not selected ON?, or
.
Would you like to be a passenger or a crew member in the aircraft which is not fitted with TCAS and is involved in a midair collision that could possibly have been prevented by the provision of VFR ATC traffic separation or DTI (not provided in E and G airspace)??, or
.
Would you like to be a passenger or a crew member in the aircraft which is not fitted with ADS-B and is involved in a midair collision that could possibly have been prevented by ADS-B subsidised fitment to all aircraft capable of powering the equipment?
.
... related to the thrust of your query, perhaps you might also clarify your position on the more important related issues i.e.
.
Do you support ATS Separation/segregation/Traffic services to RPT?
.
Do you support subsidised fitment of digital ADS-B (including integral digital encoders)?
.
.. perhaps you might send out a media statement to that effect, and explain how your current 'safety activism' is consistent with your previously related airspace mantra's
.
.