I have represented appellants at a number of planning appeals over the years and the last two posters are absolutely correct. What matters are the issues arising from planning guidance and the local plans. Talking about a decision being "unfair" takes the matter no further. It seems that the local authority have raised significant issues in relation to local plans and guidance which the Appellants must address if they are to stand any chance. Part of the refusal relates to lack of information, which the Appellants can address by getting the necessary assessments. These points and the issue of need really should have been addressed in the initial application.