PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Fidelity of older flight simulators causing unfair assessment of pilot competency
Old 22nd January 2007 | 07:43
  #5 (permalink)  
ZFT
N4790P
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 233
From: Asia
Actually, the (JAA) regulations are not quite that straightforward or even logical. It is possible to be checked/trained for landings & take offs for recurency training on a device as low as Level B. This is why DLH and Ryanair have both ordered specific Level B 737NG simulators recently.
Conversion take off & landings require Level C/D

The following is from JAR-STD1A.030

Level A - Suitable for: – Crew procedures training. – Instrument flight training. – Transition/conversion training, testing and checking except for take off and landing manoeuvres. – Recurrent training, checking and testing (type and instrument rating renewal/revalidation)

Level B - As for Level A plus: – Recency of experience (three take-offs and landings in 90 days). – Transition/conversion training for take-off and landing manoeuvres – Transition/conversion testing and checking except for take-offs and landings.

Level C - As for Level B plus: – Transition/conversion testing and checking of take- offs and landings for flight crewmembers whose minimum experience level is defined by the Authority.

Level D - As for Level C plus: – Transition/conversion testing and checking of take-off and landings for flight crews, who may be required to meet a minimum experience level defined by the Authority.

Additionally the DGAC in isolation from the JAA/EASA have recently approved an FTD for full type ratings including all manual control handling skills including take off and landings.

At a time when experience levels (especially within the developing world) are not what the used to be, an ‘interesting’ and potentially far reaching development.

At a time when the regulators should be striving for tougher regulations it appears that at least one will now accept an easier solution.
ZFT is offline  
Reply