spongebob,
I like your sense of humour at least;-)
I just don't see the point in past anger affecting future decisions. You bring up lots of disparate but relevant issues. Union membership is down...but I see no excuse for not being a member today. So if people want to save 1.25% thats fine, but don't complain about me making decisions for them with my vote! I have been here for a while so have endured lots of changes and degradations of my CoS. But I just don't see how voting for RP07 is bad for me. Spongebob, what am I missing here? I will be putting 'policy' items into my CoS...how is that bad? If I vote no and go to court, at BEST I will end up with RP94 as my rostering practice, at worst AFTLS. So how is that a win?
I know there is this underlying belief that anything they offer must be bad for us, good for them. Did it ever occur to you that it might be good for both?
The facts I want are not about past injustices...I was on the GC a few years back and saw the injustices at close quarters..I want facts on what is bad about RP07. Not paranoia, not revenge or retribution....just the plain facts as to what is so wrong with Rp07 VS the fallback!
The premise for your no vote seems to be that RP07 is worth something to CX and by holding it back we can use it in negotiations about salary? Is that about right? I don't see that it does lead to productivity/cost savings for CX so I am voting yes from that viewpoint. If voting down RP07 would put them under pressure, I would vote No. I just don't see that it does!???
Last edited by Numero Crunchero; 13th January 2007 at 15:07.
Reason: Single bit processor overloaded!