Mr Bloggs
Selfishly, I would like RP07 as it suits me having those jokers and some lifestyle rostering. But if it gets voted down I am happy to live with the consequences. I would like to see the majority vote one way or the other, like the DEFO vote.
I am not scared of the consequences if we go to fallback. I survived the rostering of RP94 on the Tristar in mid 90s...terrible rostering.
But, I don't see the point in making rostering a legal battle. If we end up in fallback and go to court and win, we will end up with RPs in our contract...exactly what voting for RP07 will do, but obviously different RPs(RP94).
If I thought that fallback would put them under pressure to improve other conditions, I would vote NO. I have not been given any logical reason for assuming that so I am pragmatically voting YES. This is a vote on rostering, not on fairness of our contract, pay issues etc.