PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Interesting note about AA Airbus crash in NYC
Old 9th Jan 2007, 17:26
  #201 (permalink)  
Few Cloudy

ex-Tanker
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Luton Beds UK
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Carbon, also a Technique recap from John Farley

As we are now on the tech site - carbon has a different ageing characteristic from that of metals, which actually start to age (in a more or less predictable way) from day one. Carbon stays "as good as new" until its breaking point is reached, when it just goes all at once.
The trick is to design a high enough breaking point. To illustrate this in everyday life, racing bike frames of carbon last much longer than aluminium ones - but if you crash one it won´t bend - it will snap.
On the matter of technique, it might be appropriate to recall John Farley´s words from another thread:
I am concerned that several pilots seem genuinely baffled that rudder use could have the fin off a fully serviceable aircraft that was properly designed and certificated. Unhappily it can, as I will try to explain in a moment.
Before I go on please may I emphasise I am not suggesting this caused the accident this thread is about, but offer these comments to the general debate about rudder use that is going on.
The mechanism I refer to is the same one employed by adults when helping youngsters to enjoy a swing. The adult applies a very small force at just the right moment in the cycle and by so doing builds up the oscillation until in the end the displacement of the swing can become very large indeed (with much yelping from the occupant)
A similar relatively small side force generated by rudder deflection, repeatedly applied, can cause a yaw oscillation to build rather than damp. There are two possible end points in this case, either the fin will stall due to the size of its AoA (in which case the aircraft will depart from controlled flight) or the fin will break before it stalls due to aerodynamic overload.
We all enjoy the powerful damping effects of yaw autostabilisers when they produce a very small force and apply it at the right moment to reduce the yaw oscillations. Now imagine a yaw autostabiliser that is working in reverse. Or a pilot that is out of phase with his feet. Or a pilot that is pushing the rudder pedals correctly but control actuation lags result in those correct inputs being delayed to an incorrect time.

Quote from John Farley,
Post from FC.
Few Cloudy is offline