Uh-oh, could be opening up a can of worms here. Things we are sure of:
8 CTCers were placed with TC last week on a Type Rating starting next week.
At least 4 of these were from the August AQC.
1 was from the July AQC.
1 had some unusual circumstances that I didn't fully understand - something about already being rated on something - dunnow, possibly irrelevant.
Why would they dip into the August and bypass all of July?
That's the question. Possibly because when the TC list was drawn up all of the July AQC group were placed with EZ. The one July AQCer was perhaps called in later due to someone dropping out of the TC group
after the February EZ rating was cancelled.
Another theory: With TC being a new/unusual client CTC may be trying to impress them with higher quality candidates and put candidates forward who performed particularly well on the AQC - many of those just happened to be from the August AQC. I think this is unlikely for many reasons but do admit that it is a possibility.