Is anyone else perplexed as to why we are voting on this subject again?
We voted no. The GC then decided to try and re-negotiate a better deal with the company which never worked. Surely that means that we accept the original vote and return to the fallback agreement.
How foolish will we look if this gets through the second time when effectively nothing has changed from the first vote?
I get the idea ST is trying very hard to push this thing through.
Why? We have already spoken!
W2