The shrimp was on holidays.
Originally Posted by
john_tullamarine
Conspiracist theorising will be tolerated to a degree .. but not indefinitely.
John, Norbert Jacquet does not make a theory but he talks about facts, with documents (on his website). For example: the story of false airline pilot licenses or the different trials he won dealing with forgeries on the crashes reports. The documents he used for these trials are huge and we are unable to present all of them here, translated, but results have to be considerated: Norbert Jacquet won the trials.
Edifying facts, just like those which have already been presented here, are numerous but are not translated in English yet. We are working on a complete file in English, but it’s a tough job and we need time for a serious work. We will put these documents on line on a website that we are going to create. Dozen of pages have to be translated, and this only for his own book!
Meanwhile, here’s a few extracts of a long legal expert’s job (7 half days), carried out by two judicial experts (on this topic, Norbert Jacquet was called a funny guy, a crackpot, a paranoiac, and he was accused of many things):
We examined Mr Norbert Jacquet on the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 11th of April 2000 at the prison of Epinal [France] … This examination did not reveal any pathology of his personality.
…
The tests did not reveal any trouble of his mental functioning nor paranoia structure of his personality.
…
Norbert Jacquet’s personality is normal. He integrated an established system of value. He knows the prohibitions and laws. He is fully able to respect them and is not inclined to infringe them.
…
His behaviour concerns a contextual and non pathological aspect.
…
[Recall of what Norbert had to go through] The fact that in such a situation his personality did not change shows us a good psychic balance.
…
Norbert Jacquet’s personality is deprived of pathology.
(
http://jacno.com/an13.htm ) Is it enough?
Originally Posted by
boeingdriverx
But look carefully at this FCOM paragraph and you will understand that this airplane was already in FLARE mode (DFDR data shows RA less than 30ft at some point) and introduced a pitch down moment exactly when the pilot needed the opposite. Pilot lack of knowledge? Airbus bad design? it is a mix of both who made this airplane crash.
Norbert Jacquet said that just after the crash. In all the newspapers:
http://jacno.com/an00.htm (“An abnormal limitation by the computer of the pilot’s action on the flight controls etc.” … “an order of the computers to land” etc.
Happy new year to all of you.