I'm not trying to muddy the water at all, but I think Vecvechookattack (what is that about?) is confusing LEAN methodology with QA techniques. (I do QA for civvy aviation)
The difference is that, in the way that LEAN is applied here, it does not seem to take into account the prime directive, or reasoning, for doing a series of tasks, as opposed to pure elimination of unnecessary needs of a single task.
QA is normally self-checked by feedback from the product-end of the Tasks and Series of Tasks and can be allowed to justify not doing, and even undoing, highlighted changes.
Can't LEAN do this? Or isnt it allowed to do this?
I must agree with above statements that this Thread must be far too difficult for our feathered friends to join in. (Well, Vecvec... excepted, of course)
The added bit..
What would "WAR" stocks be like if they were LEANed?
Last edited by Rigga; 21st Dec 2006 at 12:45.
Reason: Afterthoughts & Hindsight kicked in.