Originally Posted by
Zeke
None of what you said is true, the planned height for the flight by AF was 400ft, the hard deck for such a flight stipulated by the DGAC is higher still
I’m afraid there was another way to do it at that time
http://www1.airliners.net/open.file/0547430/M/
I don’t say it was either clever or legal... but it was commonly accepted (even by DGAC...) and practised by… Concorde … 747 … or this lovely Mercure.
Originally Posted by
Speevy
The A/T in the airbus is doing a good job as long as the input are right
Once again, even if it will never be publicly admitted, the Bus you fly today has learned
A LOT from all these early crashes, accidents, incidents.
Originally Posted by
Speevy
Fcom say you shouldn't do it below 1000ft RA
Please, would you quote such reference.
Originally Posted by
Zeke
As for your timings …
Well… all you do is sticking to the official version…
But did you realise that during
10 days, Flight Recorders have been out of any judicial control.
The Judge Sengelin had to step up and order the immediate seizure of these boxes!!!
… Strangely enough, Judge Sengelin was withdrawn from the case soon after…
Doesn’t it bother you?
Doesn’t it ring a bell to you?
On one side, you have the official version, BTW go and find it on
French BEA… It seems they’re not too proud of it.
On the other side, if you’re ready to open your mind, and learn many things, there are 3 books (No luck: All of them in French) but all of them available on the web.