PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Continental Engine Query...
View Single Post
Old 5th December 2006 | 13:43
  #12 (permalink)  
gaunty

Don Quixote Impersonator
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,402
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Griffo me old.

Dunno who you've got in mind as clients but if they are weakened warriors , I would think twice about the Robertson STOL. You and I know you should only use the "extra" performance as a buffer unless you have 'proper' STOL training.

It will only be a matter of time before some wannabe hero takes it to the edge of the STOL envelope and becomes a statistic.

Otherwise they are a fantastic performer, should be a tad faster than standard. Had a STOL P210 with all the fruit in stock for about 6 months couldn't bring myself to sell it.

The engine? take it for a good long blast at max cruise then get em checked. I'm personally not happy with the usual ground engine run test.

Airframe corrosion?? is not a respecter of inland or coastal conditions, if my memory serves me that era was plagued with filiform corrosion as a result of the painting method then being used. Either way the cost of a major adverse corrosion event may be more than the aircraft is worth. Its easy to check.

Good luck
gaunty is offline  
Reply