Originally Posted by
Tombstone
132 hours is way of the mark & stinks of half hearted journo research.
As opposed to a half-hearted post by someone who can't be bothered to read the linked article.
Had you done so, you'd have seen him cite the source:
The figures emerged from parliamentary questions asked by Mike Hancock, LibDem MP for Portsmouth South, and were confirmed by Adam Ingram, the Armed Forces Minister.
If the figures are 'stinking and way off the mark' then I suggest you aim your remarks at Adam Ingram!