I ask if it's ok by BALPA to support such rape and pilliage of others schemes, why are YOU a different case?
As I understand it the argument is that BA can afford BALPAs proposal (which would mean poorer benefits than those available to current retirees). Is it beyond the realm of possibility that BALPA realised that your company could not afford to meet its' commitment to your pension fund and there was no room for manouvre?