PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - MR/TR compared with Coaxial Aircraft Design
Old 14th November 2006 | 07:16
  #3 (permalink)  
ShyTorque

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
: ATPL
Posts: 15,111
Likes: 1,085
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Smile

For a co-axial rotor, a bigger/taller rotor mast is needed. There is extra parasite drag from this. In higher speed flight, a tail rotor can be offloaded by good aerodynamic design of the tail empennage.

A co-ax is good for low speed lifting because there is no "wasted" tail rotor thrust.

Two separate main rotors are even better because there is less airflow interference between them.

As always, design is a compromise.
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply