PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - ATZ Size
Thread: ATZ Size
View Single Post
Old 12th November 2006 | 16:32
  #5 (permalink)  
rodan
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 353
Likes: 4
From: Around
Originally Posted by chevvron
Ah but Exeter and Humberside ARE regional airports, and they don't have regulated airspace. In any case, if the ATZ remains class G, then class G VFR rules will apply (140kt or less anyway) rather than class D rules; creates known traffic without as much restriction for transits.
I believe that a class G ATZ of increased dimensions would be more restrictive than class D, not less. RAS separation standards (3nm/1000' between identified traffic) would apply between the majority of IFR passenger transport a/c and VFR transiters, whereas with a class D zone the separation can be reduced (isn't even required at all, strictly speaking). In both cases clearance to enter would be required. I imagine this'll be where someone suggests class E, but where the issue is conflict between unknown VFR against IFR traffic on an instrument approach, class E completely fails to resolve this.
rodan is offline  
Reply