Originally Posted by
BEXIL160
You've fallen for the management line (again).
Yeah of course.
All true. But if NATS management weren't quite so interested in making a huge PROFIT out of "the business" and would settle for a small profit the there would be no problem.
(Whatever happened to NATS, the not for profit organisation?)
NATS aren't allowed to make a huge profit, the regulator sets the charges. NATS is a business and businesses make money and profit, otherwise they go bust.
Pure supposition. Would UK government allow NATS to go Bust? Dunno.... and neither does anyone. Comparisons with RailTrack don't add up.
They knew Railtrack were going under and they allowed it. I don't trust Tony and his cronies one inch.
Why deal with this (possible non) issue at this particular moment in time?
Because its going to take years and years (10, 20?) for results to show and its got to be done before the start of 'negotiations' for CP3.
No fingers in ears, just a very healthy suspicion of anything that comes from NATS management who may well have ulterior motives.
Do you really TRUST The baron?
No, i thought not.
Nor do I trust the government and I am VERY worried about my pension. I don't want it jeopardised because we've failed to take action NOW!
BD