Actually, Cat, I reckon it might be you who doesn't have much clue. It's good that you demonstrate your contempt for the idea that human capital might be important. Gives the 'prospectives' an idea of what to expect when they get there- management from the dark ages.
Do a google search for 'human capital' and see what drops out. Might drag you into the 80's!!
While you are there, try a definition of 'free market'. Is it really that wild an idea that it might apply equally to employers, as employees? Read what Scott Voight is saying about people not showing up for courses etc., and think about what you are spouting. When you have a bit of a read about what happens in well-run companies (clearly you've never worked at one), you might find out that a main driver of satisfaction is not $$, it's feeling valued and respected, being able to contribute- shocking, pinko "'tree hugging' philosophy", but there you go. Much easier for talentless fish in small ponds- like yourself- to expound the virtues of bonds, isn't it?
ps Are you in the habit of replying to posts a year after they are written?
Hempy- who is asking for "more money"? Do you really think service more important/valuable than experience?