PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Aerodynamic Efficiency: Tractor Propeller verses Pusher Propeller
Old 18th October 2006 | 00:44
  #9 (permalink)  
Dave_Jackson
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Smile

Flingwing,

A couple of guesses;
~ The rear propeller came about before the global warming. Perhaps early IceBreakers were destroying too many bow-mounted propellers.
~ Submariners weren't too happy about timing torpedo launches with the rotation of the blades.

How about if we compromise and put the prop in the middle.


Seriously;
~ Perhaps a tractor prop on a ship would spend a lot of its time thrashing air and waves.
~ Again perhaps, the slower speed of the submarine and the density of the water results in a clean flow entering the pusher propeller. Just a guess.


Mart,

I did not mean to imply that the prop should be operational during hover and transition. One of the advantages of a pusher prop is that it can be a folding one, thereby minimizing drag and contact with foreign objects at slow speeds.


Dave
Dave_Jackson is offline  
Reply