Jacko,
Especially when as supporting evidence you have the bullishness of the TPs
So, at the subsequent Board of Inquiry, the evidence supporting the RTS was the "bullishness of the tps"
No, can't see that one lasting long as a defence.
Mind you, not far behind would be the claim that
And if it was good enough then, it must be within the "let the IPT decide if they're willing to accept the risk"
Like it or not, objective evidence is what is required. Counter evidence is very strong.
And stop calling me Shirley.
sw