I seem to remember a certain number of Tobacco companies using similar tactics in the nineties.
Anyone that threatened to question the medical evidence that they provided by "their own" medical experts against independent evidence came in for some serious litigation issues. Every report that came to light about companies using certain chemicals to enhance addiction came up for legal bullying.
It is a cheap tactic used by large multi national companies for what RYR now is. Cheaper to use a legal team than trying to improve T + C 's.
Unfortunately any person, body and lets face it authority/ regulator (the I.. whatever it is?) that now question RYR or MOL's wishes face exactly the same type of persecution.
Be warned this thing that is RYR is getting to big for anybody to handle.
Roll on the CAA and the ANO. Let us see if they can do something? I wouldn't hold my breath though!
They have 3 engine transatlantic arguments to be getting on with.