K1,
Hard to tell if there will be any significant advantages; however, having managed to track the form down it would appear to be considerably better than the 6000. What is of more concern is the process in which it is raised, i.e. the 1st RO gets it before the subject. He then writes his statements based on the subjects JPA choices of postings.
If this is designed to be more efficient, then as a 1st RO, I will still require a breakdown of the individual’s activities throughout the year - so he will use a non-standard format to illustrate his activities. ( I know some don't agree with this). Odd.
I am not sure about 'boarding' of all NCA trades together. Unsure if this will ever happen and if it did would you realistically get people moving around different fleets? Different thread.....
Things to consider
Q? Why introduce a new reporting format based around a flawed admin system (JPA)?
Q? If the Army and RN reject JPA, how can the new reporting system be tri-service?
Q? What was the reasoning behind NCA moving away from the previous system?