Vorsicht, you seem to keep draging me back into this, so let me respond.
On the other thread I went to lengths to explain what "not good enough" meant. You interpret that as you must be "the best", that's your words not mine.
My post was in response to someone who thought that it is OK to undercut purely as retaliation for missing out on QF, clearly someone you really shouldn't want to defend... or is it?
Now go back and read my analogy about the footy team I got knocked back from, my point was that I was actually a good footy player, this seems to be contrary to how you took my post.