Originally Posted by
Sqwak7700
Well, you might want to read about the "quick upgrade" on other posts. This issue has been discussed many many times. Upgrade at CX is NOT based on seniority. Please realize that before you come here. Upgrade is not in your hands.
I do agree, it is a great place to work. It certainly beats jobs in the US in my opinion, but there are parts of it that just don't make any sense and I would like changed.
My initial thoughts on this are that it is a positive. I have been in two flying jobs now, military and regional airline, where command was given to those based on time of service, ability to meet a minimum (low) standard, and not being a complete idiot (sometimes). While this may seem the most "fair", it really does not serve the organization well. It appears to eliminate any meritocratic incentive to perform above the minimum standard. It also eliminates some politics in promotion, but really just shifts them to other sectors (ie training, checking, management, schedules, etc.)
Seniority-based promotion also reduces true PIC authority. There are many captains, flight-leads, instructors, check-airmen, SEFE's that know they don't deserve their position over others. We all know it, and sometimes it causes a break-down in the chain of command - usually when the shxx hits the fan. Now, you introduce more politics as bruised egos need a fix.
I equate a seniority based system to socialism and meritocratic system to capitalism. Neither are perfect, but I will take capitalism and its record over socialism any day.
What do you think about this can of worms?