Originally Posted by
Minesapint
One of the biggest problems I have working on a number of large projects around NATS, is convincing some elements of the engineering world that the ATC requirement is king. Big mistakes were made in the NERc project as the shutters went up and fingers plugged ears, there is an element of that in the CASPIAN project - not in the ATC side though. Seriously, if you have any questions concerning this then there are groups of people at Swanwick that can answer your questions, or refer you to people who can.
Not many at Swanwick working on CASPIAN yet, their focus is iFACTS. Most of CASPIAN is with OS&D over at the CTC but I'm Swanwick based and doing some work for ATC User assurance, PM me if you've questions.
If SACTA cannot interface with EFPS I will be stunned!
Not so much SACTA as the FDP system which is being worked under iTEC-eFDP.
Can SACTA meet the ATC requirement? Time will tell.
If it doesn't it won't be through lack of effort or trying by the ATC people directly involved in the project.
Same answer for delivering on time
No comment
BD