Rolling vs static takeoffs
The new company I work for has a "policy" of doing static takeoffs for all takeoffs in the Citation 560 series. I dislike them for several reasons.
1. You sit on the runway for extra time fine tuning the power.
2. I can't imagine it is good for the airplane, sitting in position at high power sucking up who knows what, and the airplane feels like it is straining, ie vibrating and shaking, I know it is a jet but they still do.
3. The other part of the "policy" is that you release the brakes slowly, which I think defeats the purpose of static, ie minimize ground roll.
4. FO's have a hard time keeping it straight, until things are stabilized.
I realize the performance numbers are based on static TO's, but I would like to know if anybody has the actual numbers for this airplane, comparing the 2 takeoffs. Most of the runways have at least 50-75% more runway than is required. I would also take reccomendations for any other jet aircraft.
Thanks.