cazatou (K52)
You seem to be very familiar with the workings of the HOL committee. Even able to quote specific paragraphs. You illustrate well the fact that the committee took exhaustive evidence from all sides. By the end, this impartial group must have been extremely well informed!
Would you remind us what determination the committee came to when considering the issue of human failings (negligence), or indeed their opinion of the reviewing officer's tenuous grasp on reality. Perhaps again quoting a paragraph or two.
PS: I note you agree with me that your (and the MOD's) assertion that the aircraft was in cloud at waypoint change is not based on
any evidence!
How odd that you (and they) feel comfortable speculating in such a way.
"who needs facts when I've given you my opinion" Staff attitude that led to the initial miscarriage.
Nice point An Teallach