Andy Nicholls,
Please do not be deceived by cazatou's usual wild and selective distortion of the facts:.
To some it quite clear that the entire Crew are innocent and to others that the the Pilots....
He fails to mention the majority of pprune campaigners who simply say that there is insufficient evidence for a verdict of gross negligence "with absolutely no doubt whatsoever".
There was no evidence of Hostile Action, Explosion, Structural Failure,
There was certainly evidence of structural failure which experts witnesses could not say did not occur before impact. And there was evidence of a previous occurrence on this particular airframe. Please read John Blakeley's report which you can find on
http://chinook-justice.org/
Please also note that cazatou often fails to justify his wild statements e.g. he has refused to answer Tandemrotor's challenge to produce evidence of his claim that they were in cloud at waypoint change.
I think that he is trying to outdo Brian Dixon's claim to be an "irritating sod".
cazatou,
I think that, until you can justify these statements with
evidence you are completely discredited and should keep quiet.