ABIW
By exploring this theory, many contradictions and flaws in the assumptions by the BOI and others have been brought into focus. Basic conditions and parameters pertaining to this flight have been established. Limitations of equipment made clear. Most of all, a picture has emerged of the last leg of this flight which is clear, understandable, and reasonable which at the very least reduces any blame on the pilots to a judgment error as opposed to their having been in breach of flying regulations taking an incomprehensible course of action.
Whether the theory turns out to be correct or not does not detract from its being a framework for analysis and debate – thus far it has done well in this respect.
While not yet proven, some detractors so far have either used erroneous or inapplicable arguments or have shown some misunderstanding of conditions or systems; some have made statements that, at face value, should have ended it but have not backed those statements up with background information that would make them convincing, especially when the person making such statements has said something else previously with equal confidence that has proven to be wrong.
An intriguing aspect is that the system suggested by the theory seems to be a taboo subject here with very little coming back on the open forum – with the advances made in such systems, it is hard to imagine 12 years on why it should be still such a great secret especially when there is so much information on it overseas – so many of you seem to be sticking your heads in the sand – this theory is unpalatable but so far it remains to have been a possibility and the ramifications of its being correct are so very serious that surely every stone should be unturned in exploring it – it also clears the pilots’ names and perhaps could lead to real justice.
.
If this is what a fool has been doing, what have you contributed in these last 12 years? – in anticipation of the answer, what does that make you?