Nicetouch,
As I said, its horses for courses, we are all individuals and we all have our our own personal sensibilities in relation to terms and conditions
As for my own opinions well......I firmly believe a workplace should be an environment where mutual respect exists, there needs to be a clear and defined direction for the workforce, with clear and defined roles and responsibilities. I also consider that all those key values need to come from the top..in equal proportions. Clearly in MOL's case with regards to his own personality, as well as several of his flight Ops management team this is not the case (as the recent court case has highlighted). So on balance for me RYR is not a place I would wish to work.
EZY, again for many of the same reasons, has become a workplace that many if given the choice would choose to go elsewhere. The difference I can presently see (as NSF pointed out) is that AH seems to be willing to listen to what the troops on the ground have got to say. I think its probably accurate to say that in this regard the jury is still out on how EZY will evolve under new leadership, there does still exist a cadre of Rays' appointee's floating around orangeland management circles, they will need to be dealt with at some point.
On balance neither place is for me (and going back to the original threads question) I cant see that the turnover of staff will reduce anytime soon.
By definition neither place should be considered career airlines yet